Subscribe to Full RSS Feed
Favorite this Blog on Technorati
Add this blog to Delicious

John Chow No Longer a Dot Com Mogul?

I read a posting by John Chow earlier this month called Requirements To Be a Dot Com Mogul. He details a list of 7 items that must be met in order to be a Dot Com Mogul (as you may have guessed from the title).

On this list is a very interesting item:

A Google search of your name must be at the #1 spot

On a recent search of the term John Chow I found that the closest entry for the original John Chow is at #19 (page 2) with his MyBlogLog profile.

I’ve read on the site (and on many others) that John was punished by Google for using a linking strategy they didn’t appreciate. I would accept this as an excuse; however, a Dot Com Mogul should know better!

Learn from John
This article he wrote makes me think about all the rules and lists that people write on their blogs everyday. While it’s one thing to create information for people, it’s very different to practice what you preach. If you’re going to use definitive statements like “I will never…” or lists like John’s, you could end up having to backtrack and explain yourself or even lose readers as a result.

John’s Next Step
I think this may just be a case of being a little sure-of-one’s-self. In John’s case, he does have the history and the income/businesses to back up the claim, but I still think you should follow your own rules. I’m going to simply ask that John quietly remove the Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul tag, until he receives forgiveness from on-high (Google) and gets his name back up top where it should be. Maybe the tag could be replaced with Evil Ramblings of an Online Money Making Star or something like that.

All this being said, for a company who has been the leader in creative business practice, maybe Google should cut a guy a break when he comes up with a great way to spread the news about his site!

If you want to win friends and influence people, consider my full feed RSS.

Tags: , , ,

Coffee time at Lewis Empire dot Com  If you liked this post, buy me a coffee!
(so I can stay up late and keep writing)


 Full Feed RSS

 |  Add to Technorati Favorites  |   | 

 | 

Stumble this posting

 |  Reddit

RSS feed | Trackback URI

19 Comments »

MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by dcr
2007-08-29 23:17:50

Great linkbait post. Informative too. It’ll be interesting to see if John Chow himself stops by your blog!

MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Lewis
2007-08-29 23:33:43

I’ll know if he changes his tag line! I think ‘Evil Ramblings’ has a nice ring to it…

 
 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Vijay Teach Me
2007-08-30 06:25:49

Hahahah lol………..
He does like to evil sometimes…

Vijay

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Chee Kui
2007-08-31 01:14:06

When you really think about it, those things that he said doesn’t really matter, because people loves him… and he will always be a dotcom mogul in their heart ;)

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Debo Hobo
2007-08-31 10:03:03

Outstanding post, goes to show everyone must walk the walk if you talk the talk. Especially the so called stars.

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Debo Hobo
2007-09-01 12:40:36

I linked to your post on my blog. John Chow came by and read it. His evilness has gone and changed the rules to be a Dot Com Mogul jusdging from the response to my comment on his blog.

http://www.debohobo.com/2007/09/01/debo-hobo-week-in-review/

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by John Cow
2007-09-01 14:44:50

Last time we checked, a certain Cow came out on the first spot when you’d look for “john chow”

MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by SEO Optimization
2007-09-01 15:50:07

haha, oh that Cow comes out almost everywhere. Anyway maybe he should just scratch the line where he says “When search your name should be #1″ and be fine, instead of changing the whole line.

 
2007-09-03 11:03:08

Which I think is absolutely hilarious!

 
 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Amanda Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-01 17:19:05

I dont think being #1 makes you a dot com mogul so i dunno i think he should remove that bit but he is a mogul makes more in a month than most people do

 
2007-09-01 20:48:24

Well all I can say is, great linkbait :P

http://www.markettreasure.com

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by MONEY BLUE BOOk Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-02 09:35:47

I think when you’re raking in that much money a month, it really doesn’t matter what people call you or what your title is. He could be “John Chow - The drunkin’ ramblings of a 3 foot, crossed eyed mountain goat” and he’d still be laughing his way to the bank. Mere semantics.. :)

- Raymond (MONEY BLUE BOOK)

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by SEO Optimization
2007-09-03 08:41:08

Well said. I do like the “smiling his way to the bank” scene :P

 
 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by NothingMan Subscribed to comments via email
2007-09-02 19:37:41

hahahaha. Excellent points. Regardless, Chow is a friggin dotNet mogul. Good post though, you got my attention :-)

 
2007-09-03 11:18:58

It wouldn’t matter what he actually calls himself as others have already said, he’s making all the money he wants and I guess that would be enough :)

http://www.markettreasure.com

 
2007-10-26 09:24:10

Hi there,

thanks for sharing your experience related to the “secret” concept of life. I haven’t read the book but has taken a glimpse of the movie trailer. Kind of fascinating concept but then i also found out that there are a lot of people don’t agree with the concept at all. maybe i need to try myself about the concept and then after that only i could give some evaluation on it.

 
MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by gary Subscribed to comments via email
2008-05-20 22:18:27

nice post. But it takes time to establish yourself as a internet mogul.So chillax man and enjoy your blogging experience.

MyAvatars 0.2 Comment by Lewis Empire
2008-05-29 14:49:41

I didn’t make the Mogul rules - John Chow did. If you can’t live up to your own rules…

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.